Oregon stand-off: Occupiers ‘ready to surrender’

The four armed occupiers of a US government wildlife reserve in the US state of Oregon are preparing to surrender, a member of the group says.

Sean Anderson said they would leave the Malheur complex on Thursday morning, in a live broadcast on the internet.

Earlier, the FBI moved in on the group, which had been entrenched for 40 days.
They are protesting against federal government control of local land. One activist died in an earlier confrontation with police.

Agents were placed behind barricades near the self-styled militia's encampment, an FBI statement said.

Putting down weapons

All four of the militia were said to be present during a discussion, broadcast in a live online audio stream, about how they would put down their weapons and walk out of the refuge at 08:00 local time (16:00 GMT).

They will meet a Nevada lawmaker, Michele Fiore, and a preacher who were travelling to meet them. Ms Fiore, a Republican member of the Nevada state assembly, was also on the live stream conference call.

She said that the FBI had "given us their word that they are going to stand down tonight" on the understanding that the four would leave the complex in the morning.
The broadcast ended shortly before 22:00 local time.

As well as Mr Anderson, 48, the other occupiers have been named as Sandy Anderson, 47; David Fry, 27; Jeff Banta, 46.

The four had refused to leave despite the arrest of the group's leader Ammon Bundy last month. He has urged those remaining to stand down.

The Malheur National Wildlife Refuge was seized early in January. The armed takeover was sparked by the return to prison of two Oregon ranchers accused of burning federal land.

It developed into a wider protest demanding the return of government-controlled land to locals.
Mr Bundy and others were arrested late in January in a confrontation with police that left one of the activists, LaVoy Finicum, dead.

The live stream of events inside the refuge has been a strange mixture of prayer and paranoia, of fear and defiance.

The occupiers have repeatedly accused the federal government of persecuting them and they have attacked President Barack Obama for trying to "take away guns from people who are depressed".

With tens of thousands listening, the militia revealed that they had been eating well, talking about hearty cooked breakfasts, pork fried rice and steaks.

At one point, an occupier compared himself to the Scottish patriot William Wallace, suggesting that he too would rather die than give up his freedom.

"Remember Braveheart? Braveheart took it to the end even when he was tortured," he said.

At other times members of the quartet have sounded despairing, repeatedly expressing the fear that they will be shot dead.

The broadcast ended with song and prayer shortly before 22:00 local time (06:00 GMT).

The FBI said its agents moved in on the four on Wednesday after one of them drove a vehicle outside barricades erected by the group.

"We reached a point where it became necessary to take action in a way that best ensured the safety of those on the refuge, the law enforcement officers who are on scene, and the people of Harney Count," the statement said.
The Oregon stand-off

How did it begin?

In October, a federal judge ruled the sentences on two Oregon ranchers, Dwight and Steven Hammond, for burning federal land were too short and jailed them for about four years each.

Angered by the ruling, Nevada native Ammon Bundy began a social media campaign backing them and travelled to Burns, Oregon, organising meetings.

His group attracted supporters from across a number of states and Mr Bundy called it Citizens for Constitutional Freedom. On 2 January the armed militiamen took over the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge — and widened the range of demands.
What are the militia's aims?

It is an extension of the Sagebrush Revolution of the 1970s and 1980s that demanded the transfer of federal land in many western states to local control.

Mr Bundy's own father — a Nevada rancher — had been involved in a protest over cattle-grazing rights in 2014. One policy is to try to persuade ranchers to tear up their federal grazing contracts.

Although many local residents are sympathetic with its cause, many also oppose the occupation of the refuge. Even the local ranchers who are serving the longer sentences distanced themselves from the militia.

Are militias legal?

The term has a complex history and generally refers to those outside the official military who can be called on in times of need. The US Constitution refers to the president having command of "militia of several states" and that Congress "can call forth militia" to tackle insurrection and invasion.

Those who form such militias cite the constitution and various references in federal and state law as granting them legality.

Подписывайтесь на канал